<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unthread Text Frames</title>
	<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/tips-tricks/t1/tip-o-the-day/2007/unthread-text-frames/</link>
	<description>The Authority for News &#038; Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: peevedNconfused</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/tips-tricks/t1/tip-o-the-day/2007/unthread-text-frames/#comment-20852</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/tips-tricks/t1/tip-o-the-day/2007/unthread-text-frames/#comment-20852</guid>
					<description>I'm not sure why, but this doesn't work for me. When I double click on either the out-port of the source text box or the in-port of the destination text box, it just creates a new, linked text box. It's infuriating. Clicking on the out-port of one and then the in-port of another doesn't work, either. The only way I can kill off text threads is to delete all the text boxes that I don't want linked. Usually, I want to keep the text boxes, but not the links. Sheesh! It's not enough to make me go back to Quark, but it doesn't leave me singing the praises of InDesign, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why, but this doesn&#8217;t work for me. When I double click on either the out-port of the source text box or the in-port of the destination text box, it just creates a new, linked text box. It&#8217;s infuriating. Clicking on the out-port of one and then the in-port of another doesn&#8217;t work, either. The only way I can kill off text threads is to delete all the text boxes that I don&#8217;t want linked. Usually, I want to keep the text boxes, but not the links. Sheesh! It&#8217;s not enough to make me go back to Quark, but it doesn&#8217;t leave me singing the praises of InDesign, either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
