<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Buzz: QuarkXPress 7 Launch Event, 23 May 2006</title>
	<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/the-buzz-quarkxpress-7-launch-event-23-may-2006/</link>
	<description>The Authority for News &#038; Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/the-buzz-quarkxpress-7-launch-event-23-may-2006/#comment-2135</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/the-buzz-quarkxpress-7-launch-event-23-may-2006/#comment-2135</guid>
					<description>Call me crazy, but I am looking forward to the Quark event. I've donwloaded and used Quark 7 beta 1 and 2, and I am really impressed with the quality of the program, especially on the Mac platform. I've used the software on Windows XP and Mac OS X. I tried both InDesign CS and QuarkXPress 7 and I feel that Quark has the upper-hand for my work. I can run QuarkXPress 7 beta 2 just fine on my iBook G3 with 768MB RAM. Try that with InDesign CS2 and you won't get past the installation program since it requires a G4 processor, and is WAY too slow for me. The text quality of InDesign CS is excellent, but I need layout speed. Quark delivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me crazy, but I am looking forward to the Quark event. I&#8217;ve donwloaded and used Quark 7 beta 1 and 2, and I am really impressed with the quality of the program, especially on the Mac platform. I&#8217;ve used the software on Windows XP and Mac OS X. I tried both InDesign CS and QuarkXPress 7 and I feel that Quark has the upper-hand for my work. I can run QuarkXPress 7 beta 2 just fine on my iBook G3 with 768MB RAM. Try that with InDesign CS2 and you won&#8217;t get past the installation program since it requires a G4 processor, and is WAY too slow for me. The text quality of InDesign CS is excellent, but I need layout speed. Quark delivers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ninondo73</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/the-buzz-quarkxpress-7-launch-event-23-may-2006/#comment-2114</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/the-buzz-quarkxpress-7-launch-event-23-may-2006/#comment-2114</guid>
					<description>I read an article about their new preflight features within the application. I used PasteBoard and FlightCheck Professional from Markzware for over 7 years now. I think they have a patent  on their product. I hate to see Quark and Adobe ripping off other company patent.  Adobe In-Design has preflight build-in but its so lame.  I still use FlightCheck Professional, it save my life so many time and I will continue to stick with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article about their new preflight features within the application. I used PasteBoard and FlightCheck Professional from Markzware for over 7 years now. I think they have a patent  on their product. I hate to see Quark and Adobe ripping off other company patent.  Adobe In-Design has preflight build-in but its so lame.  I still use FlightCheck Professional, it save my life so many time and I will continue to stick with it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
