<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuarkXPress 7 &#038; Highlights From Quark Summit</title>
	<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/</link>
	<description>The Authority for News &#038; Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Samuel John Klein</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/#comment-154</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/#comment-154</guid>
					<description>Well, with &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; sort of ramping-up on investment, Quark's either gonna wow us or go down in flames most spectactular



Ahh. But &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; they catch up?



When I first heard about things like activation and the attitude of Fred Ebrahimi (not to mention the things he says about customers), I had to scratch my head and wonder how it got so big, and why people were still loyal to it. Then I learned about installed base and the concept of &lt;i&gt;workflow&lt;/i&gt; and I understood not only why Quark was popular (if not XActly beloved) and why InDesign was still playing catchup after so much good development.



When I heard that Quark was allowing 2 concurrent installations I was surprised. Not quite a sea change, maybe, but from the company that made you pay complete extra for your home machine and your carry-out, it certainly is something that made go &lt;i&gt;hmmmm&lt;/i&gt;.



And allowing me to upgrade from educational license 5.01 to commerical 6.1... given Quark's rep I was flat astounded. This, from Q, amounted to rank generosity. The phone people I talked with, while clearly outsourced, were quick and friendly.



Will it be worth upgrading to 7?



&lt;i&gt;Hmmmmmm.....&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, with <i>that</i> sort of ramping-up on investment, Quark&#8217;s either gonna wow us or go down in flames most spectactular</p>
<p>Ahh. But <i>can</i> they catch up?</p>
<p>When I first heard about things like activation and the attitude of Fred Ebrahimi (not to mention the things he says about customers), I had to scratch my head and wonder how it got so big, and why people were still loyal to it. Then I learned about installed base and the concept of <i>workflow</i> and I understood not only why Quark was popular (if not XActly beloved) and why InDesign was still playing catchup after so much good development.</p>
<p>When I heard that Quark was allowing 2 concurrent installations I was surprised. Not quite a sea change, maybe, but from the company that made you pay complete extra for your home machine and your carry-out, it certainly is something that made go <i>hmmmm</i>.</p>
<p>And allowing me to upgrade from educational license 5.01 to commerical 6.1&#8230; given Quark&#8217;s rep I was flat astounded. This, from Q, amounted to rank generosity. The phone people I talked with, while clearly outsourced, were quick and friendly.</p>
<p>Will it be worth upgrading to 7?</p>
<p><i>Hmmmmmm&#8230;..</i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pariah Burke</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/#comment-155</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/#comment-155</guid>
					<description>I dunno. I think if Quark gets 7 out to market soon, they just might save it. Many corporations set their fiscal years to end around September; a large number of others follow the calendar year. If Quark can get 7 out to market by September, they can capitolize on end-of-year spending as well as new year budgets. If they way 6 months or more, they'll miss the prime buying season.



Quark 7 might save Ebrahimi's ass yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. I think if Quark gets 7 out to market soon, they just might save it. Many corporations set their fiscal years to end around September; a large number of others follow the calendar year. If Quark can get 7 out to market by September, they can capitolize on end-of-year spending as well as new year budgets. If they way 6 months or more, they&#8217;ll miss the prime buying season.</p>
<p>Quark 7 might save Ebrahimi&#8217;s ass yet.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexandra Jordan</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/#comment-156</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2004/quarkxpress-7-highlights-from-quark-summit/#comment-156</guid>
					<description>Here's some more scraps from the Quark table...



http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=581
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some more scraps from the Quark table&#8230;</p>
<p><a href='http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=581'>appleinsider.com/article.php?id=581</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
