Comments on: Response To "A QuarkXPress User's Review of Indesign CS" http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/response-to-a-quarkxpress-users-review-of-indesign-cs/ The Authority for News & Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:42:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Samuel John Klein http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/response-to-a-quarkxpress-users-review-of-indesign-cs/#comment-298 Sun, 23 Jan 2005 03:47:02 +0000 http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/response-to-a-quarkxpress-users-review-of-indesign-cs/#comment-298 Good response to a wonderful, if long, review. Fortunately he has an irreverent style, which makes such an ADD-challenger worth toughing out. No, I'm not giving away the ending. People need to read this review. It really is a blow-by-blow illustration of the internal components of what a layouter evaluates when they consider which software to use, what decisions they make, and where they eventually go for thier tools.<!-- strikes = --> Good response to a wonderful, if long, review. Fortunately he has an irreverent style, which makes such an ADD-challenger worth toughing out.

No, I’m not giving away the ending. People need to read this review. It really is a blow-by-blow illustration of the internal components of what a layouter evaluates when they consider which software to use, what decisions they make, and where they eventually go for thier tools.

]]>