http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/ The Authority for News & Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:22:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/#comment-1082 Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:21:30 +0000 http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/#comment-1082 I believe this guy is just some Quark defender. I used Quark in the past, then switched *wel not really but i used it in school. However, even if this site(some of it) praises InDesign's features and tools. It is not the site's fault it's InDesign, yes, for being such a good product. I am not a publisher. I am an old Pagemaker user that found that having InDesign CS is a great tool not only for Publishing but for daily stuff. And if we love it so much, well we have the right to talk about it like it was the greatest software out there. Paco and by the way sorry for my spelling mistakes*jejeje I believe this guy is just some Quark defender. I used Quark in the past, then switched *wel not really but i used it in school. However, even if this site(some of it) praises InDesign’s features and tools. It is not the site’s fault it’s InDesign, yes, for being such a good product. I am not a publisher. I am an old Pagemaker user that found that having InDesign CS is a great tool not only for Publishing but for daily stuff.
And if we love it so much, well we have the right to talk about it like it was the greatest software out there.
Paco and by the way sorry for my spelling mistakes*jejeje

]]> http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/#comment-1078 Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:13:58 +0000 http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/#comment-1078 FWIW, I've noticed my own articles are biased against Quark and X-Ray Magazine, and favor InDesign and InDesign Magazine, but if I can back it up with clear evidence then it's not a bias as much as it's simply a judgment of quality. If QuarkXPress had the tools and features of InDesign, or if X-Ray had the tutorials and useful information that InDesign Magazine has, then I'd crow about it. Because that's all we're wanting, is the best tools possible for doing the work we all love. FWIW, I’ve noticed my own articles are biased against Quark and X-Ray Magazine, and favor InDesign and InDesign Magazine, but if I can back it up with clear evidence then it’s not a bias as much as it’s simply a judgment of quality. If QuarkXPress had the tools and features of InDesign, or if X-Ray had the tutorials and useful information that InDesign Magazine has, then I’d crow about it. Because that’s all we’re wanting, is the best tools possible for doing the work we all love.

]]> http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/#comment-1075 Fri, 04 Nov 2005 23:48:56 +0000 http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2005/biased-against-quark/#comment-1075 Well said. This is social news, sides tip as the information spreads, just as Apple is all the craze, and the delays in Vista are a downer. What fun would it be if it wasn't a rollercoaster for us? Well said.
This is social news, sides tip as the information spreads, just as Apple is all the craze, and the delays in Vista are a downer. What fun would it be if it wasn’t a rollercoaster for us?

]]>